|
|
Special Christmas Edition |
|
CPN News Update |
|
Welcome to the Corruption Prevention
Network special Christmas edition of News Update. The CPN News Update is designed to keep you abreast of all
the latest Corruption Prevention news.
CPN News Update provides a collection
of current news, events and publications from various government and
non-corporate organisations. If you would like to contribute to the Corruption
Prevention Network News Update please email Sarah at sarah.dimech [at]
uts.edu.au
á Call for resources: The
CPN is continuing to build a library of resources for the benefit of
members. If you have a policy or
resource that you feel may benefit other organisations, please email it to cpn
[at] corruptionprevention.net to have it posted on the Internet site.
á The CPN Annual Conference will be held on Thursday 8th
September 2005, so pencil it in now!!!!
á Presentation slides are now available on the Internet site for the
seminar ÒAvoiding Investigation PitfallsÓ http://www.corruptionprevention.net/resources/resources04_07.html
á The Annual General Meeting was held last Friday 3rd December
2004. The new Office Bearers
appointments are as follows:
-
Chair: Chris Ballantine (NSWG, Education)
-
Vice Chair: Charles Hughes (NSWG, Commerce)
-
Secretary: Sarah Dimech (UTS)
-
Treasurer: Neville Gordon (Shoalhaven City Council)
Recent
Publications and Bulletins:
NSW ICAC Publications:
Managing conflicts of interest in the public sector: Resources
These are resources that explain the principles that should govern the
management of conflicts of interest.
Managing Conflicts of Interest in the Public Sector: Toolkit
The tool kit is designed to assist government organisations to develop
and implement a customised conflicts of interest management system, and to help
individual public officials identify, manage and monitor conflicts of
interest - 120 page ring-bound resource that includes the Guidelines generic
training resource
For further information visit -
In addition, see the article below by the ICAC in relation to the new
tool kit and resources.
Other Publications:
á
Comfraud Bulletin
http://www.afp.gov.au/afp/page/Crime/Fraud/ComfraudBulletins.htm
International Links:
á
OECD anti corruption
newsletter for Asia/Pacific
http://www1.oecd.org/daf/asiacom/pdf/nl02.pdf
á
Fighting Fraud and
Corruption
http://www.ex.ac.uk/~RDavies/arian/scandals/fight.html
á
The Institute of
Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
http://www.icaew.co.uk/library/index.cfm?AUB=TB2I_31341
In
the Know!!!!!
Choosing
the Right Hotline:
The
popularity of Corruption Prevention and Ethics Hotlines has increased ten- fold
over the last few years. Choosing
the right hotline for your organisation can be difficult. The Corruption Prevention Network
therefore will be doing a Special Hotlines Edition of CPN News in February
2005. In this edition the CPN will
be inviting companies who supply Hotlines to write a small spiel on their
company and what it can offer you.
If you know of any such companies that may want to participate please
email Sarah by Friday 4th February 2005.
5th National
Investigations Symposium
The National Investigations Symposium
is held every two years as a forum for public officials to learn about new
approaches and techniques that can enhance fact-finding skills. The two-day conference is an
opportunity to learn from the experiences of others and make vital contacts.
The 5th National
Investigations Symposium was held at the Manly Pacific Hotel, Sydney on 4 and 5
November.
The symposium featured a strong
line-up of speakers, including:
-
Gherardo Colombo, former Investigating Magistrate and Prosecuting
Attorney, Office of the Attorney-General, Milan
-
Jeremy Pope, Co-Director, TIRI, the London based Governance Access
Learning Network and foundation managing director of Transparency
International,
-
Alan Doig, Professor of Public Services Management, University of
Teeside, UK, and previously Head, Centre for Fraud Management Studies, John
Moores University
-
Dr Kate Storey-White, CEO AudioLex, UK.
-
Gherardo Colombo spoke about the large-scale
investigations into systemic corruption in Italy, which began in 1992 and
investigated more than 5,000 people, including four former Premiers, more than
150 former and present Members of Parliament, councillors and mayors and even
judges, while Dr Storey-White spoke about forensic techniques for examining
sounds, voice, text and language.
-
Well-known journalist Quentin Dempster chaired
a session with Frank Costigan QC and Justice Geoffrey Kennedy QC speaking about
the legacy of some of the most significant inquiries in Australian political
history, such as the ÔWA IncÕ inquiry and the Victorian Painters and Dockers
Royal Commission.
-
Peter Hall QC, Counsel Assisting the
Waterfall Inquiry, spoke about the importance of selecting the appropriate
investigation methodology when investigating matters involving systemic
problems, while Dr Russell Smith, Deputy Director, Australian Institute of
Criminology, spoke about key issues in the prosecution of financial crime and
corruption.
-
Dr SmithÕs presentation focused on how to
facilitate detecting and reporting of financial crime and corruption; how to
reduce delay in investigations and prosecutions; how to contain the cost of
investigations; how to achieve effective sanctions and how to make effective
use of decisions.
A key theme of the symposium was integrity systems – the
practices and institutions that work to sustain accountability and control
corruption, misconduct and maladministration.
Professor Alan Doig presented an
international perspective on integrity systems in 33 countries, while Dr AJ
Brown, Director of Integrity & Corruption Research at Griffith UniversityÕs
Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance, presented findings from the
Integrity Systems Assessment Project conducted by Transparency International
and the Key Centre.
This project represents a first
attempt to ÔmapÕ a single countryÕs integrity systems, to gain a better
understanding of how such systems interact, where the strengths and gaps are,
and what practical reforms or further research might help ensure the best
possible integrity systems into the future.
The symposium covered a wide range of
other issues, including investigating document and information leaks,
confronting cultural issues in investigations and investigative journalism
strategies and techniques.
This year the evaluation of the
symposium is being done by way of an online survey. All delegates who attended have now been sent an electronic
link to give access to the survey.
Responses are due by 13 December 2004. Please take the time to complete the survey as the results
will help symposium organisers to make the program interesting and relevant for
delegates.
The National Investigations Symposium
is organised by the Institute of Public Administration Australia (NSW
Division), NSW Ombudsman and the ICAC. For more information visit the IPAA
website www.nsw.ipaa.org.au or contact
IPAA on (02) 9228 5225.
Presentation slides for the Symposium
may now be found at http://www.nsw.ipaa.org.au/07_publications/4nic_papers.htm
Standard on Risk Management
The updated version of the Standard on Risk Management (AS/NZS
4360:2004) was launched on 16 September 2004. The theme of managing risk was neatly reinforced by the
event being held at the Sydney Aquarium with sharks swimming past continuously,
and two divers in the tank holding up a banner about the new Standard!
The previous version of the Standard has become highly influential
globally, in all sectors. The new Standard offers:
á
greater emphasis on
embedding risks management practices into organisations' cultures and processes
á
heightened focus on the
management of potential gain as well as potential loss
á
more prominence given to
communication and its importance to the overall process
á
extensive supporting
guidance in the form of a Handbook (HB 436).
Copies of the Standard and the Handbook are available for purchase
through SAI Global (the publishing house for Standards Aust) at http://www.standards.com.au/catalogue/script/Details.asp?DocN=AS564557616854
Two of
AustraliaÕs leading integrity agencies have joined forces to tackle the most
prevalent corruption and misconduct issue facing the public sector –
managing conflicts of interest.
The overwhelming majority of matters that come before the Independent
Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in NSW, and QueenslandÕs Crime and
Misconduct Commission (CMC), involve conflicts of interest. In response, the
agencies have jointly produced new best practice guidelines on the issue, which
are expected to become industry standard throughout Australia.
Managing
Conflicts of Interest in the Public Sector: Guidelines and Toolkit were
launched on 9 November 2004 to provide practical advice on how to implement
policies and procedures to effectively handle conflicts of interest. They aim
to assist state and local government elected officials, state government
departments, local governments, universities, boards, government corporations
as well as businesses.
The purpose
of the Guidelines is to assist public sector leaders in the development of a
policy framework for managing conflicts of interest. The Toolkit contains practical information and resources to
support the implementation of best practice policy. The tools give options and plans that organisations can
adapt to assist in the effective development, introduction and review of a
conflicts of interest management system
The guidelines and toolkit are available electronically at www.icac.nsw.gov.au or in
hardcopy by downloading the order form for fax-back for the ICAC.
Discussion Point
The following is a new section
designed to get people offering ideas on issues other CPN subscribers might
have to deal with. Each newsletter
will have an article, which looks at a particular topic. The CPN encourages feedback from
readers on what they think of the issue, or how they have dealt with such
issues in their organisations.
Input from subscribers will appear each issue in the ÒHave your SayÓ
section. If you would like to
write an article for this section, please contact Sarah.
A Friendly Reminder to all
StaffÉ.
ItÕs beginning to look a lot like
Christmas, or so the song says, which means everything will soon become chaotic
as Christmas always is. At one end
of the scale you have employees busily preparing for the end of year
celebrations, calling friends, hanging Christmas decorations and exchanging
gifts. On the other end of the
scale employers should be busily reminding staff that receiving gifts or
benefits from external partners and clients is never that simple.
Take the example of two friends who
exchange gifts each year on birthdays.
The normal scenario is that as soon as one of the friends stops buying
for the other, the second friend will follow suit and also stop giving
gifts. That is not to say that all
people are alike, and that you as the second friend wouldnÕt continue to give
gifts. But, and a big ÔbutÕ at
that, most people expect something in return for a gift or benefit and this is
when your corruption prevention Ôspidy sensesÕ should kick in.
Particularly you should be asking
what external parties are giving gifts and benefits and which staff members are
receiving them. For a nice twist
on the giving and receiving of gifts and benefits you might also want to ask
the questions, who in your organisation is giving gifts and benefits, to whom,
and with what money and authorisation?
Ideally all of these issues should be
covered under policy. If you donÕt
have a policy it is suggested you implement one as soon as possible. A good guide for writing a policy on
gifts and benefits may be found in the Independent Commission Against
Corruption publication, ÒGifts,
benefits or just plain bribes? Guidelines for public sector agencies and
officialsÓ. The guidelines may be
found at the ICAC websites: http://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/index.cfm?objectid=E29C323D-A7CD-5ED6-91AE5341BF067721.
Other issues you might want to
consider when writing a policy on gifts and benefits are whether you will be
requiring staff to register when they receive a gift. If so, from whom, and under what circumstances? For example, should employees be
registering gifts under $20.00, over $30.00? What figure is acceptable?
This time two years ago, I sent an
email out to the CPN Mail list asking what amount was acceptable in asking
staff to register gifts and benefits. On examining the figures I received, I was left with
an average of $30.00. That is,
employees should be registering gifts and benefits that are valued at $30.00 or
more.
So does registering gifts and
benefits work? I asked this
question to a number of CPN Committee Members. One response I received was from Chris Ballantine,
Department of Education and Training.
According to Chris, the Department
of Education and Training Code of Conduct states that the value of a nominal
gift that can usually be accepted is $50.00. However, just because the nominal amount is $50.00 does not
mean that all gifts and benefits can be accepted. Chris gives the example of a telephone conversation he
had the day before with a school principal.
The principal asked about situations when students take up a collection
and present teachers with gifts of value far in excess of $50. As Chris explained, ÒThe DET view is
that students should not feel that they need to give gifts as there could be a
perception at least that teachers will favour students/classes that give gifts.
The Department takes a softer view of final year students presenting teachers
with giftsÓ.
The above example demonstrates that
limitations should be drawn and that all situations should be examined when
implementing a gifts and benefits policy.
Once you have
implemented a gifts and benefits policy, you will need to ensure that staff are
made aware of it. Some examples of
this include utilising your organisationÕs newsletters, messages on pay slips, and broadcast emails. For a more creative approach you might
want to consider something along the lines of sending little pretend money bags
with chocolate in them to senior managers with a little note reminding them to remind
staff of the policy, as demonstrated in the picture.
Sarah Dimech
University of Technology, Sydney
(Opinions expressed in this article
are that of the writer only and are not necessarily the opinions of the
University of Technology, Sydney)
Have Your Say:

The Corruption Prevention Network would like to wish everyone a very
merry Christmas and a happy New Year.
Disclaimer:
Please note that information
regarding the various publications and training have been taken directly from
the various Internet sites cited.
In some cases the information has been paraphrased. Advertising of Publications and
Training is with permission of the provider. If any information is cited incorrectly, or if people wish
to no longer have their details cited in this publication or wish to add
additional information, please email sarah.dimech [at] uts.edu.au and we will
amend accordingly.